René de Baaij

From System to Meaning

Personal leadership is not primarily about influence, visibility, or directing others, but about how you inhabit your inner world, your relationships, and your environment. 

Personal leadership is not primarily about influence, visibility, or directing others, but about how you inhabit your inner world, your relationships, and your environment.

In this theme, we approach personal leadership as a psychodynamic and HUMAN–AI challenge: how you lead yourself in a field where unconscious patterns pull—and digital systems do too.

A psychodynamic lens means exploring which voices start speaking inside you when something is at stake. The harsh inner critic. The impatient accelerator. The part that desperately wants to avoid rejection. The loyal protector who would rather accommodate than confront. These inner figures are shaped by earlier experiences and they colour your leadership style: how you set boundaries, take risks, speak up—or freeze.

Personal leadership begins where you not only understand this dynamic, but learn to recognise it in the moment. When you say “yes” while feeling “no.” When you hide behind busyness, procedures, or just a little too much responsibility. Or when you want to take control — even of AI systems you do not fully trust, yet still rely on.

AI makes this challenge more acute. You can outsource more and more: analysis, text, planning, decision preparation. The question then becomes: what do I want to remain personally present for? How do you ensure that your perception, sensitivity, and moral compass do not become numbed by convenience, speed, and false certainty?

Personal leadership in a HUMAN–AI context calls for three interrelated movements. First, self-inquiry: getting to know your motives, fears, and defence mechanisms — especially under pressure. Then inner positioning: consciously choosing where you yourself want to look, weigh, and take responsibility, even when a system suggests otherwise. And finally integrity: bringing words, actions, values, and the use of technology into alignment.

In this theme, AI is not an external force but a mirror: what does your way of engaging with systems reveal about how you lead yourself? Personal leadership then becomes transformation from the inside out — not doing more, but being present differently.

Intervention

DBVP approaches personal leadership as a matter of inner ordering: how do you lead yourself within a field of expectations, loyalties, power, and technology? It is less about tricks or visibility, and more about transformation from the inside out.

Psychodynamisch kijken we naar de innerlijke dynamiek achter je keuzes: de pleaser, de criticus, de redder, de controleur, de conflictvermijder. Het zijn geen “eigenschappen”, maar in de tijd gevormde beschermingsmechanismen en loyaliteiten. We werken met momenten waarop je vastloopt of doorschiet: wanneer je ja zegt terwijl je nee voelt, harder gaat werken in plaats van te begrenzen, jezelf verliest in verantwoordelijkheid, of je verschuilt achter regels en drukte. De spanning zien we als informatie over wat je (nog) lastig vindt om te verdragen—en dus als toegangspoort tot ontwikkeling.

From a systemic perspective, we place personal leadership within your position in the whole. Role, mandate, organisational history, and unspoken rules all shape what you dare and do. We explore how you position yourself: where you take on responsibility that is not yours, where you leave undone what is yours, and where you sustain patterns through compensating or avoiding. Personal leadership then means: taking up a mature position, with respect for the whole, without losing yourself.

We explicitly include HUMAN–AI as a socio-technical reality. Your daily choices are increasingly influenced by data, systems, and AI. We explore how you relate to this: do you use AI as support, as an oracle, as an excuse, or as something to distrust? Which judgements do you outsource, and where do you consciously continue to look and weigh for yourself? AI thus becomes a mirror for leadership: what does your use of technology reveal about courage, boundaries, and moral compass?

How we intervene is consistent and concrete. We start from your real task: what do you want and need to lead as a person-leader? We work with situations where there is friction, not with generic models. We slow down around decisive moments and explore what was at play — internally, relationally, systemically, and digitally. We create a setting in which sharpness and gentleness go together: looking honestly without tearing yourself down. And we explicitly keep ownership with you; DBVP is a guide, mirror, and challenger, not the director of your life. In this way, personal leadership becomes an ongoing process of transformation from the inside out: you do not become “more” of a leader, but freer, more congruent, and more consciously present — even in a world in which AI increasingly participates.

Methodological considerations

At DBVP, we see personal development and individual leadership as a single movement: inwardly maturing in how you look, choose, and take up your position, within a field full of expectations, loyalties, and digital systems. We start from your real task — what you, as a human being and professional, are called to lead — because otherwise development quickly becomes unfocused. We work from transformation from the inside out: patterns only change sustainably when you learn to know and tolerate the emotional logic behind them, not merely understand it. Psychodynamically, we explore inner voices, early experiences, and loyalties; systemically, we look at your place in work, family, organisation, and society. We explicitly include HUMAN–AI in this: how technology influences your attention, pace, boundaries, and self-image, and the choices you consciously make within that.

Typical methods and techniques

We often begin with biographical and role exploration. We examine key experiences — success, failure, loss, recognition, shame — and trace patterns over time: how do you typically respond to tension, dependency, power, and control pressure? From this, we formulate a personal guiding question that provides direction: what is your development truly about at this moment?

We then work with sharp, present-day cases: situations involving boundary violations, overload, conflict, moral dilemmas, or working with AI advice. We slow down around key moments — what did you feel, what did you think, what did you do, what did you refrain from? — and explore alternative responses, including the inner work required for them, such as grieving, taking risks, or letting go of an old identity.

We consciously bring inner leadership into relationships. You practise setting boundaries, slowing down, speaking up, and asking questions in the relationships that matter — at work and in private life. We explore transference: which old figures are “in the room” when you speak with a manager, partner, or colleague? And we work with metacommunication: being able to name what is happening now between you and the other, without hardening or disappearing.

In addition, we engage in HUMAN–AI–specific reflection. We examine digital reflexes — escaping into screens, exerting control through systems, comparing yourself through data — and cases in which technology partly shapes your judgement, pace, or boundaries. Central throughout is the choice: where do you want to remain personally present, despite convenience and false certainty?

Finally, we build rhythm and anchoring. We create personal reflection routines, engage in shadowing or observation during critical conversations where appropriate, and design small experiments in daily life: a different choice, a different pace, a different response — and then reflect together on what this evokes.

DBVP brings language, structure, and a sharp yet safe mirror; you bring your story, patterns, and courage. In this way, personal development and individual leadership become an ongoing process of inner ordering — visible in how you are present, make choices, and engage with systems and AI.